<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Daily Grind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily</link>
	<description>PokerAnon&#039;s Daily Grind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:52:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hand history review time by PokerAnon</title>
		<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/10nl-6-max/hand-history-review-time/comment-page-1/#comment-3204</link>
		<dc:creator>PokerAnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/?p=1832#comment-3204</guid>
		<description>In summary, no awful stack offs from tilt or brain death. Some questionable call downs but there&#039;s always some sort of reason. And a lot of missed value where the bet sizing was too small when I had value but was afraid to lose my opponents.

Choked preflop aggression got me in trouble with the AQ on the button against AK, though AQ in position should be okay but the board ran out badly, and 88 where I flopped a set, though the QQ UTG might then 3 bet and I&#039;d have to fold, or the 66 in the blind though I got sucked out on on the river. If I&#039;m results oriented, then mostly just the AQ 3 bet/fold would have helped, and even that only if he 4 bets his AK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In summary, no awful stack offs from tilt or brain death. Some questionable call downs but there&#8217;s always some sort of reason. And a lot of missed value where the bet sizing was too small when I had value but was afraid to lose my opponents.</p>
<p>Choked preflop aggression got me in trouble with the AQ on the button against AK, though AQ in position should be okay but the board ran out badly, and 88 where I flopped a set, though the QQ UTG might then 3 bet and I&#8217;d have to fold, or the 66 in the blind though I got sucked out on on the river. If I&#8217;m results oriented, then mostly just the AQ 3 bet/fold would have helped, and even that only if he 4 bets his AK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Rush Poker by J PokerPLayer</title>
		<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/rush-poker/more-rush-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>J PokerPLayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/?p=749#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>I have found that Rush Poker is Super Mega Bait For Fishes. The games have higher variance at $10nl because everybody is trying to get all in early in the hand. I am not sure about 25nl rush because I just bypassed it playing full ring, but 50nl has been a steady winner (including a couple down sessions). I have only played around 7,000 hands, but my win rate is similar to full ring games.. I just play solid poker with a few minor adjustments regarding the pate position steal and re steal possibilities. Most players seem to buy in short and can not play 100bb+ bb deep at this level, which makes it simpler to play against them. Sorry, no specific advice, because I have not moved to 100nl rush yet and I want to keep winning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found that Rush Poker is Super Mega Bait For Fishes. The games have higher variance at $10nl because everybody is trying to get all in early in the hand. I am not sure about 25nl rush because I just bypassed it playing full ring, but 50nl has been a steady winner (including a couple down sessions). I have only played around 7,000 hands, but my win rate is similar to full ring games.. I just play solid poker with a few minor adjustments regarding the pate position steal and re steal possibilities. Most players seem to buy in short and can not play 100bb+ bb deep at this level, which makes it simpler to play against them. Sorry, no specific advice, because I have not moved to 100nl rush yet and I want to keep winning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More Rush Poker by pokerbot</title>
		<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/rush-poker/more-rush-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>pokerbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 09:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/daily/?p=749#comment-724</guid>
		<description>great thoughts and I love the posts but what about the ugly issue of collusion in online poker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great thoughts and I love the posts but what about the ugly issue of collusion in online poker?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

