<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why not play more, and higher levels?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/index/micro-level-poker/why-not-play-more-and-higher-levels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/index/micro-level-poker/why-not-play-more-and-higher-levels/</link>
	<description>Poker basics, theory, strategy, thinking, learning, analysis, and lots of general musing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PokerAnon</title>
		<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/index/micro-level-poker/why-not-play-more-and-higher-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>PokerAnon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/?p=988#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>Yep, no disagreement from me about your winnings coming from playing weaker players. Gottta beat the rake somehow. :) It comes down to weighing the tradeoffs; frustration of playing weak players or of winning small amounts versus lower winning rates but more challenging opponents. For some people it would be a matter of where you earn more per hour, but for me as a casual player, it&#039;s finding the sweet spot that gives me the most overall satisfaction. And that sweet spot is going to keep moving the longer that I play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, no disagreement from me about your winnings coming from playing weaker players. Gottta beat the rake somehow. <img src='http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It comes down to weighing the tradeoffs; frustration of playing weak players or of winning small amounts versus lower winning rates but more challenging opponents. For some people it would be a matter of where you earn more per hour, but for me as a casual player, it&#8217;s finding the sweet spot that gives me the most overall satisfaction. And that sweet spot is going to keep moving the longer that I play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poker Farce</title>
		<link>http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/index/micro-level-poker/why-not-play-more-and-higher-levels/comment-page-1/#comment-1309</link>
		<dc:creator>Poker Farce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anon-poker-blog.com/?p=988#comment-1309</guid>
		<description>Nothing wrong with playing the weaker players in my opinion. It&#039;s not about being scared. That&#039;s where your profit comes from over the long run. I hear Barry Greenstein talk about this a lot and it&#039;s also evident in some of the players who play int he high stakes games; You can be a great player, but it doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;ll be a winning player. Winning has a lot to do with your game selection and things like that. The importance of making good decisions about where to play and who to play against is often underestimated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing wrong with playing the weaker players in my opinion. It&#8217;s not about being scared. That&#8217;s where your profit comes from over the long run. I hear Barry Greenstein talk about this a lot and it&#8217;s also evident in some of the players who play int he high stakes games; You can be a great player, but it doesn&#8217;t mean you&#8217;ll be a winning player. Winning has a lot to do with your game selection and things like that. The importance of making good decisions about where to play and who to play against is often underestimated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
